Tags
American history, Andrew Johnson, biographies, book reviews, David Stewart, Eric McKitrick, Hans Trefousse, Howard Means, presidential biographies
Of the six presidents to lead the nation after James Polk, only Abraham Lincoln left a legacy that escaped the bottom quartile. And while Lincoln is usually considered one of the all-time great presidents, Andrew Johnson almost always ranks dead last.
But that is hardly unexpected. Working enthusiastically to obstruct a significant civil rights movement can have that affect on a reputation. And going out of one’s way to agitate Congress never seems to help.
Many of the weak presidents who preceded Lincoln are blamed for doing virtually nothing to champion the rights of all Americans (including those not even considered citizens). But at nearly every turn Johnson seemed to go out of his way to ensure that social progress was impeded. And ironically he did so while claiming to vigorously support the Constitution.
I was surprised to learn almost nothing of Johnson while reading my dozen biographies of his predecessor, Abraham Lincoln. But why would an author focused on one of the most interesting and successful presidents choose to direct attention toward an obstinate, self-righteous politician like Johnson?
But as much as I enjoyed reading about Lincoln, after nearly four months on our sixteenth president I actually looked forward to shifting gears and learning about Andrew Johnson. What I learned was interesting…but disappointing. Fortunately, many of the biographies were engaging – even if the subject was unsatisfying.
* * *
* The first biography of Johnson I read was “Andrew Johnson: A Biography” by Hans Trefousse. This biography, like most, emphasizes Johnson’s presidency at the expense of the more inspirational story of his youth and his ambitious rise to political power. Also similar to other biographies of Johnson, I learned very little of his family and even of the man himself on a personal level.
Perhaps more than any other biography, however, Trefousse’s treatment of Johnson is very well balanced and resists the temptation to castigate the former president for his every transgression. Overall, Hans Trefousse’s biography is thorough and reliable but not particularly exciting. (Full review here)
–
* Next was Howard Means’s 2006 “The Avenger Takes His Place: Andrew Johnson and the 45 Days That Changed the Nation.” This is by no means a comprehensive cradle-to-grave biography, but instead focuses on the critical weeks following Lincoln’s assassination and Johnson’s ascension to the presidency. Although the title promises too much (it’s not really obvious the book focuses on forty-five days that changed the nation) the book offers an excellent preface and equally compelling concluding chapter.
Means also provides important background on Johnson’s early life despite this not being a comprehensive biography. However, this book often seems more like a brainstorm than an organized series of thoughts. I frequently lost track of the timeline (and even Johnson himself) in the story’s flow. But even though this is far from an ideal biography of Andrew Johnson, it does offer important tidbits and lessons on this deeply flawed man. (Full review here)
–
* The third biography of Johnson I read was “Impeached: The Trial of President Andrew Johnson and the Fight for Lincoln’s Legacy” by David Stewart. Not surprisingly, Stewart’s book focuses principally on Johnson’s presidency and, specifically, his impeachment. And despite the fact this topic could easily become complex and burdensome, for the most part Stewart keeps the story clear and interesting.
And although not a narrative of Johnson’s life in the spirit of a David McCullough biography, Stewart provides enough colorful context to paint a vivid picture of the times. Like Means’s study of the early Johnson presidency, Stewart’s biography has both an excellent preface and a fantastic concluding chapter. And of all four biographers of Johnson, Stewart is the one I wish had actually attempted to write the definitive biography of Johnson’s entire life. (Full review here)
–
* Lastly, and unplanned when I first started reading about Andrew Johnson about a month ago, I read Eric McKitrick’s 1960 “Andrew Johnson and Reconstruction.” Recommended by a regular visitor to this site, McKitrick’s work was one of the very first to re-assess Johnson as a racially insensitive failure rather than as a patriotic but misunderstood martyr.
McKitrick’s study is extremely well researched, well written and well organized. Although its scholarly tone may not appeal to a mass audience, its messages are not difficult to uncover – even for a novice. Anyone interested in Johnson’s presidency should at least read the opening chapter; here McKitrick explains the rationale and basis for the entire book.
In hindsight, this book seems really to be a co-biography of Johnson and Congress during the early years of Reconstruction. And in that spirit, McKitrick’s work is invaluable even though it does not make an ideal biography. (Full review here)
– – – – – – –
Best Comprehensive Biography of Johnson: “Impeached: The Trial of President Andrew Johnson and the Fight for Lincoln’s Legacy” by David Stewart
After taking a sojourn from US Presidents to read a biography on Jefferson Davis, I decided to read Trefousse’s volume. This was the shortest biography I have read since Van Buren, but this brief bio was not only more engaging it was also more informative. However, I prefer more academic biographies which provide more insight into the subject and their political perspectives. For instance, in one paragraph 30 pages before the end of the book Trefousse mentions Johnson wanted constitutional amendments to have popular elections for the president, Senate, and term limited popular elections for Supreme Court justices, these are transformational ideas which received a paragraph…at the end of the book. Overall, I agree with Steve, “Trefousse’s biography is easy to read and almost always resists the temptation to overwhelm the reader with more detail than is needed,” but I feel this is also a negative and I will probably read McKitrick’s in the future in hopes of gaining a more in depth understanding of Johnson’s political perspectives.
Just returned from a visit to Andrew Johnson’s home in Greeneville, Tennessee. The site is managed by the National Parks and it was worth the trip. We stopped there on the way to Nashville where we toured Jackson’s home – the Hermitage. You can tour the Johnson home as well as see the tailor shop where he worked. It was interesting although a bit biased towards Johnson. I had read “Impeached: The Trial of President Andrew Johnson and the Fight for Lincoln’s Legacy” by David Stewart which I thought painted a negative picture of Johnson. Now I am thinking of reading another bio of Johnson to get a more balanced view. I was thinking of the Hans Trefousse bio.
Brenda Wineapple has a new book on Johnson coming out next May. Her Ecstatic Nation is an excellent cultural/political look at the Civil War era so I’m looking forward to it!
Turns out I had this on my list already but didn’t remember. But you spurred me to do a bit of research on the author and I have to admit, I’m probably going to have to read her biography of Nathaniel Hawthorne at some point…
Was just in Atlanta and toured the massive Civil War Cyclorama. As always I buy a book at these places, “Decision in the West; The Atlanta Campaign of 1864” by Albert Castel. He’s a very engaging writer, actually writes in the present tense, which is rather neat. Among his works he has a biography of Andrew Johnson, which seems to have gotten some praise for being fair. Did you come across this one when assembling your list?
I read this one (“The Presidency of Andrew Johnson” by Albert Castel) and I don’t really recommend it. Castel is easy to read and he seems to be making an effort to be fair, but in the last chapter, “Johnson before the Bar of History,” he says several things that made me uncomfortable, including the very odd conclusion that efforts in the 1960s and 1970s didn’t improve conditions for “the Negro” so probably a better Reconstruction wouldn’t have either. Castel’s book was published in 1979, and I feel as though “the Negro” was already the wrong term to use by then, but I could be wrong. Anyway, the book left me with an icky feeling. I’m going to try the Stewart book instead.
Hey Steve. I’ve been a long time peruser of this website and I must say it’s utterly fantastic work you’ve done here; in fact I have your site favourited and check it a lot daily for reference. I wanted to let you know that there’s a fantastic biography of Andrew Johnson called “Plebeian and Patriot” by Robert Winston that I think you would enjoy. It was published in the 1920s around the time the Supreme Court ruled the tenure of office act unconstitutional. It’s a great read, albeit a bit dated in style, and attempts to paint Johnson in a positive, misunderstood light, which, while coming across as quite a stretch, is nevertheless intriguing. Despite its age, having consumed other biographies from the first half of the twentieth century, I think you’ll enjoy it. It’s certainly comprehensive: I have an Easton Press edition which numbers 519 pages before the appendix and index. Keep up the phenomenal work!
Thanks – this one certainly hasn’t crossed my path before so thanks for the tip! I’m going to have to investigate…
Hey Steve,
I was wondering what your thoughts were on Wineapple’s book on Andrew Johnson?
I haven’t read it yet but obviously need to. I have heard that it’s a pretty interesting account of his presidency and although it doesn’t cover his life soup-to-nuts it captures almost everything that most people would want to know. Your note reminds me I need to find a place for this one at some point soon 🙂