Tags
American history, biographies, book reviews, Margaret Leech, presidential biographies, Presidents, Pulitzer Prize, William McKinley
“In the Days of McKinley” is Margaret Leech’s Pulitzer Prize-winning 1959 biography of William McKinley. It remains one of the standard texts on this president and is indispensable to serious students of his era. Leech was a historian, author and the winner of two Pulitzer Prizes. She died in 1974 at the age of eighty.
In many ways, this book is less a traditional presidential biography than a life-and-times centered around McKinley and his presidency. Although it never strays too far from McKinley, there are numerous stretches where he is only peripheral to the story – and sometimes fails to appear at all.
Leech covers McKinley’s life up to his presidential campaign in the first fifty or sixty pages. The remainder of the book’s 605 pages are dedicated to a period of about five years, ending with his assassination in 1901. The introduction to McKinley, while comparatively brief, is interesting, colorful, fact-filled and often breathtakingly insightful.
On the strength of meticulous research she expertly dissects his personality and provides a descriptive and well-rounded portrait of this future president. It seems doubtful that anyone who did not know McKinley personally could better understand his personality and character than this author.
These early pages proceed quickly through his Ohio childhood, his college education (cut short by health and finances), his Civil War service and his legal career. With equal speed Leech reviews his nearly fifteen-year Congressional career and terms as Ohio’s governor. This introduction seems more designed to describe McKinley than recount the events of his life prior to seeking the presidency.
This portion of the book also provides an immediate and clear sense of Leech’s unique writing style. Though the modern reader will find her style dated and occasionally difficult, it is also wonderfully erudite, lively and often extremely clever. Much of the text possesses a lyrical quality and her writing has the power to take the reader on a wonderfully scenic literary journey. (I’m tempted to go back and re-read the first chapters on McKinley just to experience Leech’s particular brand of wisdom and style once more.)
But make no mistake – this book is not easy to read (quickly or otherwise). Not only is it lengthy, but it is also quite dense. Even the best passages can require extraordinary care and patience to fully appreciate, and important messages can be lost in language that is alluring but cryptic. Readers who are accustomed to a carefully delineated timeline will find themselves quickly bewildered.
In addition, Leech’s biography is both wonderfully and tediously detailed. Historians focused on the late 19th and early 20th centuries will love this book but casual readers will often find it dull and sluggish. The fact that much of the book focuses on events of the era, rather than on McKinley himself, may add insult to injury for some.
Finally, although Leech has an uncanny ability to dissect and analyze people as well as historical events, it seems ironic (and disappointing) that she is committed to providing far more detail than analysis or interpretation. I suspect most readers would gladly trade a large chunk of the book’s detail in return for a handful of additional pages offering Leech’s perspective on McKinley’s actions or his legacy.
As a historical document, Margaret Leech’s “In the Days of McKinley” is immensely valuable and provides an astonishingly detailed account of the most important events of McKinley’s presidency. It also provides rich, if not equally exhaustive, insight into the man himself. But as a presidential biography it is far from perfect, requiring significant patience, providing too little of the author’s perspective and underemphasizing McKinley at the expense of world events.
Overall Rating: 3¼ stars
Reblogged this on History Book Reviews.
I’ve read a few pages of the book. Chose the first few pages and some random pages covering McKinley’s Presidential Election. The English seems manageable to me. Steve, do you remember which part of the book was where the English started getting difficult? I’m planning to buy this book, you see.
Personally, I wouldn’t mark down an author because of his or her lack of analysis if he or her offers you enough detail and lays the facts out in a way which allows you to make your own judgment. No matter how insightful and incisive an analyst any author may be, there’s a limit as to how much he or her can discern an individual’s emotional state and thought process. I never read the book so I can’t question your comments but I suspect you might have been too hard on this author. The underemphasis of McKinley’s impact on his times as opposed to world events could be because her focus was on his period rather than him, as explained by the title.
There’s another question I’d like to ask: personal, if you don’t mind. I saw the background you gave on the blog. How are you able to finish so many books in such a short period of time? Do you read every word or do you speed read through each book you read? Even if I were to spend as much time as you do, I doubt I can finish even half the books you’ve finished given my reading speed. What’s more, you’re an investment banker. I’m surprised you can make so much time to read your way through the Presidents. Down here, investment bankers are worked as though they’re cotton pickers on the Southern plantations before the Civil War, if you know what I mean. I find it miraculous you can still sit down for a good book even after wading through a whole day of financial hogwash. I hope I’ll be like you someday when I’m in such a capacity.
Good luck and best wishes for you from Singapore in making your way down the 20th century of Presidents. You have my utmost respect and admiration for surviving through the 19th century ones. When you get to Hoover, I hope you’ll try reading the series I recommended earlier. I can give it to you again if you’ve missed it. I’m very interested to know what you think about it since I’ve the third and second last volumes in my collection, the ones dealing with Hoover’s tenure as Secretary of Commerce and President. I’ve got a lot of things to read so I won’t be going to them for the time being, but I hope to do so one day.
I hope you can understand my limited English. Looking forward to your reply – your fan Darren
Darren, thanks for the detailed comments. First, I’m happy to say I am 20+ years into my investment banking career so the demands of the job have gone from consistently more than 100 hours per week (physically possible, but just barely) during the first decade to the point where I am able to command a small army of folks who are similarly dedicated (ah, the joys of seniority).
Between hours spent sitting on planes (mostly on the tarmac, it seems), sitting in the bleachers at swim and soccer practices, and given my propensity for getting up well before sunrise I find enough time to get through 60-70 pages a day on average. Thankfully speed-reading is not necessary with that as a daily goal – as long as I’m consistent about the effort and don’t have to play catch-up. Much harder is figuring out what I want to say about each book and expressing my views articulately.
In terms of Leech’s book itself, it wasn’t really that the language or writing style became burdensome any any particular point. The issue was more that the writing style always forced me to move slowly and with more effort than usual, and by the early part of his presidency the text frequently became quite focused on minutia away from McKinley (events in the Philippines, for example). That’s when it became tedious for me – and there were few lessons or revelations embedded in most of these sections so little reward in that part of the sacrifice.
But this book is a historical treasure in some undefinable respect and proved to be an interesting and rewarding literary experience. Unfortunately it was so focused on McKinley’s era and not McKinley himself (or his decision-making, or his impact on history) that it fell short of my ideal presidential biography. And I’m willing to bet that very few people will get through this book and/or really enjoy it (which accounts for half the score on my subjective ratings scale). For historical value, though, it almost couldn’t receive higher marks…
Once you read it, let me know what you thought. As always, your mileage may vary but I’m extremely interested in your view.
Re: the Hoover series you mentioned – I’m very interested in reading it. I’ve got about 6-8 months before I get to his presidency but in the meantime I’m trying to figure out how to obtain the entire series without spending a small fortune.
Steve, thank you very much for sharing your experiences with me. I’m 24 so I guess I’ve got to work up to the point when I’ll be able to spare more time for reading and not worry about the bills. In the meantime, I guess I’ve got to learn how to squeeze a little time with my books in between the long stretches of work and other commitments.
60-70 pages every day? That’s marvelous! I’m embarrassed to be averaging 4 pages an hour at best since I read every word. Hopefully, I’ll reach your level one day.
True, you’re right. Part of the joy of history is being to take away something from what you read. Of course, the story’s most important but there are other things too, which make the reading experience a rewarding and fulfilling one. Do your children read like you? I think my generation, the last which spent its childhood without the gadgets we can’t do without today, was the end of the road. I hope one day one of them will embark on a similar endeavor of their own someday.
Yes, but if you give people a reason to make their way through it, they’ll find it less burdensome than some of the stuff professionals have to labor through during our time in the office. I’ve read a few reports which give me more headaches than a good number of the books I’ve read.
Thank you for your interest in my insignificant views.
I’ve just checked the prices. I see where you’re coming from. Check to see if Amazon gives you free shipping or if you’re entitled to a discount. Get as many books from Amazon as you can this way. All in one batch. See if the Amazon Prime membership will help you in any way to see if you can get anything more deducted from the bill. There might be other options.
Sorry to say this, Steve, but I’m afraid that you’ll have to get the Hoover series if you wish to get acquainted with the President. To tell you the truth, I was surprised that the life of THE President Hoover who’s popularly believed to be responsible for the Depression could fill this many volumes. I was stunned at the price too but when I read about Hoover’s achievements as Secretary of the Commerce and his Presidency, I realized there must have been much more to his life than what we usually think. I only ordered 2 volumes and read a bit of the one of his Presidency. Never regretted it since. This was what that volume on the Presidency said: Hoover was not only NOT responsible for the Depression but in fact Roosevelt’s New Deal was based on policies which Hoover himself implemented to manage the Depression. The only difference was that Roosevelt was able to tweak those policies and better able to convince the Americans to accept them.
I bought the Hoover books because I was curious about how the Depression came about. I did buy the Age of Roosevelt Volumes Two and Three but I heard that Schlesinger was overly biased towards Hoover so I decided to get the Hoover books as a substitute for Volume 1. I’ve a lack of space since I’ve such a wide range of interests when it comes to reading, even if it’s mostly history, so I’ve to be careful with what I buy.
PS: For your Roosevelt collection, there’s one book you might want to add.
http://www.amazon.com/Supreme-Power-Franklin-Roosevelt-Court/dp/0393338819/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&sr=8-1&qid=1410579237
Apologies for the long comment but there were many things I wanted to say. I hope you find it readable.
You’ve definitely got me focused on the Hoover series – and I’m fascinated by the thought that he could deserve six volumes. I’m definitely intrigued and will try to make sure I get a copy of the series in the next couple months. I’ll also look into the FDR book. It’s not one I’m familiar with, but ironically now that I’ve looked it up I realize I went to college with the author(!)
There are six in total, the Engineer, the Master of Emergencies, Imperfect Visionary, Fighting Quaker, Bearing the Torch and Humanitarian something.
The Engineer seriously deserves reprinting. I didn’t get it because the price was too high and the book was too old. Amazon charges $30 per book for shipping to Singapore if you buy from a third party. Sigh…
I’m glad you see where I’m coming from. I hope my comments are of service to you.
I hate to say it, but I agree with you, Steve. I read Leech’s book three years ago when doing some research on McKinley, and found it to be a difficult read (a crashing bore?). McKinley is an underrated president who desperately needs a high-quality biographer. I hope you find it!
I hope I do, too. My fingers are crossed! So far, Morgan’s 1963 “William McKinley and His America” lacks some of Leech’s elegant word play but is far easier to decipher and understand. But I’m only a quarter of the way in, so I’m not sure what my reaction will be when I finish it.
How rare to find something described as “wonderfully erudite.” This one sounds way too dense for my attention span.
In hindsight, those might not be two words I would naturally place next to each other(!)