Tags
American history, biographies, book reviews, Dwight Eisenhower, presidential biographies, Presidents, Stephen Ambrose
Published in 1983, “Eisenhower: Soldier, General of the Army, President-Elect, 1890-1952” is the first of two volumes in Stephen Ambrose’s famed series on the thirty-fourth president. Ambrose was a historian and the author of more than two-dozen books; he is one of the best-known biographers of Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon. But numerous, and often convincing, allegations of plagiarism and exaggeration have tarnished his reputation over the past fifteen years. Ambrose died in 2002 at the age of sixty-six.
With 572 pages of text, this first volume in Ambrose’s series has long been considered the most thorough (and, often, the “standard”) account of Eisenhower’s pre-presidency. Proceeding from Eisenhower’s ancestry to his election as president in 1952, it moves steadily – if sometimes slowly – in a strictly chronological fashion.
The first one-third of the book carries the reader up through Eisenhower’s first commanding roles in World War II. The next one-third covers his two years as Supreme Commander of Allied Forces in Europe; the remainder covers his service as U.S. Army Chief of Staff, tenure as president of Columbia University and leadership of NATO. The book ends with Eisenhower as president-elect.
Ambrose is a well-known fan of Eisenhower but outside the “Foreward” there is little evidence of his strong admiration. As a result the book reads far more like an objective assessment of his pre-presidency than the first installment of a hagiography. Readers new to Eisenhower will not only learn a great deal about the man himself but also, notwithstanding the author’s protestations to the contrary, much about “his times” as well.
But in contrast to Ambrose’s well-known and incredibly popular “Undaunted Courage” and “Band of Brothers” this book’s style is rarely captivating or colorful. Instead it is characterized by a straightforward, workmanlike and occasionally tedious quality. But if the book lacks a lively and brisk narrative, it is full of interesting observations and seems to be the product of thorough (if poorly footnoted) research.
Ambrose is usually at his best when discussing military strategy and tactics rather than day-to-day affairs. His explanation of Operation Torch, in particular, is excellent. But his personal portraits of Patton and Douglas MacArthur are also unusually compelling. In addition, he provides the best discussion of Eisenhower’s time as Chief of Staff that I’ve ever read and the most interesting discussion of the 1948 movement to draft Eisenhower as a presidential nominee I’ve encountered.
Surprisingly, though, the author’s overall treatment of D-Day is disappointing. This section of the book proves prove far less vivid and engrossing than I expected and often read like a sterile diary of military affairs. And given the book’s reputation for thoroughness, the book’s narrative is occasionally surprisingly light on details or nuance.
Eisenhower and his wife, for example, meet and find themselves married in just over a page; other biographers provide more insight on their early relationship. Ambrose is hardly more revealing when it comes to Eisenhower’s alleged affair with Kay Summersby. But even some military matters are short-changed, including Eisenhower’s cross-country Army convoy, his time in Europe with General Pershing and the court-martial inquiry which nearly derailed his early career.
Overall, Stephen Ambrose’s “Eisenhower: Soldier, General of the Army, President-Elect, 1890-1952” is a useful but often bland introduction to Dwight D. Eisenhower. If this volume is not quite “best in class” in any particular area, it is at least good in most. But while it was once the standard introduction to Eisenhower, it has clearly been surpassed by more recent, vivid and compelling accounts of Eisenhower’s life.
Overall rating: 3½ stars
* I have rated this biography without regard to allegations of plagiarism by Ambrose (which are generally directed toward his other books), allegations that he greatly exaggerated the number of interviews he conducted with Eisenhower in the preparation of this series and allegations he fabricated at least one significant quote by Eisenhower.
I enjoyed reading his Nixon biographies more than his books on Ike. He had to be the best selling historian the last decade of so of his life but those allegations that you mention seem to have killed his reputation. I don’t know how many of his books are still in print but they seem to have vanished from the shelves.
I was only vaguely aware of the allegations prior to reading this book but did spend a bit of time looking into the matter since I was committed to reading this series. It’s unfortunate Ambrose seems to have had a penchant for pushing (and stepping well past) the boundaries of reasonable behavior for an author/historian. Someone who could have been remembered for bringing history to “the masses” will, instead, be remembered for the worst aspect of his nature.
Knowing Ambrose’s history, I don’t know why you would devote time to anything he wrote, particularly on Eisenhower.
I find the allegations of plagiarism and hyperbole troubling, but the fact he probably wildly exaggerated how many times he interviewed Eisenhower and the fact he lifted passages in certain of his other books from authors without attribution does not alter the fact that his biography(ies) of Eisenhower have been considered “classics” by some and the “standard” Eisenhower texts by others. Given that, and the fact I’m not aware of the substance of this book being compromised by mistruths or “alternate facts,” it would be difficult for me to justify simply ignoring his biographies – but it’s also impossible for me to avoid referencing the allegations in my review(s).
I’m not able to step away from my bias. I understand no history is flawless, but I would never want to risk polluting my (limited) historical knowledge with false facts. It just so happens this is one instance when I know beforehand it might be happening.
I completely understand your perspective. I also happen to think it’s fortunate that there are – in my opinion – better biographies of Eisenhower’s pre-presidency so no one should feel compelled to rely on Ambrose’s perspective of early Eisenhower. If this was clearly the best of the Ike biographies (ignoring the various allegations for purposes of defining “best”) I think the situation would be more complicated.
I never thought about it at the time but Ambrose was pumping out the books at a rapid rate the last dozen or so years of his life. Look at David McCullough- he has published eleven books in fifty years. You have to have a lot of questions on Ambrose’s work.
Agreed; seems odd. But I never really know much about the resources behind a particular book. Some authors, of course, have teams doing research for them – sparing them from endless hours of work and allowing them to focus on developing the thesis and drafting the narrative. I imagine others, like Robert Caro, alone for weeks living off coffee and ramen noodles in an office handwriting post-it notes and arduously assembling a storyline for a book that might take a decade to write…
Robert Caro– anxiously awaiting his last volume on LBJ…
I haven’t even gotten to his series yet, but my fingers are crossed for his continued excellent physical and mental vitality! I can’t think of anyone more critical to understanding a specific president than Caro for LBJ. And I fervently hope he manages to complete the series with this next volume (I have no reason to think he won’t, but…)
You are in for a treat when you do get to this series. I’ve read all the books twice, I am hoping the next volume is the final one. Imagine spending forty years researching and writing about one person.
I picked this volume dirt cheap used and assumed it would be better than you said. I’ll probably decide the book on Ike I want to read someday after you review them all for me. 🙂
It has been suggested to me that I’m going to like his “Renowned One-Volume Life” of Eisenhower more. We’ll see!
I can’t wait to hear what you think. Is it next?
Volume 2 of Ambrose’s series and then his one-volume abridgement. My review of that book should come out around March 10th… Then on to JFK!
I haven’t read his Eisenhower set but when you write, “it is characterized by a straightforward, workmanlike and occasionally tedious quality,” that is exactly what comes to mind when I think of his Nixon trilogy. I’ll look forward to your reviews when you get there!
Interesting…! I would have thought Nixon was such an interesting character (at least compared to Ike who was a bit more reserved) it would be hard to come up with a trilogy that was anything but exciting. Guess I’ll see in a few months!
I hated to read about the plagiarism allegations made against Ambrose. I really enjoyed Undaunted Courage and admire what he did for WW2 veterans. I have always just hoped they were honest mistakes from too much research and items running together. Guess I always try to find the good in everyone.
I haven’t read “Undaunted Courage” but have heard it’s great writing compared to his more dispassionate approach to the Eisenhower trilogy. Definitely on my list to read at some point but it is quite disappointing when someone who has the ability to make history accessible and interesting lets down his audience in such a dramatic way.
The evidence suggests that it was less an honest mistake and more a conscious choice on Anbrose’s part
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/04/26/channelling-ike
I do not doubt the plagiarism was deliberate- I just hated it. Looking back at what he did for an entire generation of heroes and bringing them the attention they deserve makes his dishonesty more painful. How many people now know about the Band of Brothers and Richard Winters than would have without Ambrose. I enjoyed Citizen Soldiers and hope the stories in that book were not fabrications. Just hate it and am very disappointed in Ambrose overall. Just like some athletes- he would have been just fine without cheating, why do it?
I’m afraid Ambrose’s plagiarism was more extensive than sometimes is said, but at the same time perhaps not his worst crime. He apparently fabricated fictional, defamatory quotations concerning Eisenhower’s positions on civil rights. Those interested should Google together author “Irwin Gellman” and “civil rights” and “Eisenhower.” Pay particular attention to p.30 of the Fall 2015 issue of the publication Prologue. It comes up as a .pdf. Gellman also claims that Ambrose “went so far as to invent a fable that Eisenhower told a racist joke at a legislative leaders meeting.” http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/160182 Gellman is not the only source of this Ambrose offense, but I can’t find the other one where I first read this. It was discussed in a magazine article a few years ago, written by a different author who probed it and documented his findings thoroughly.
thechair
Stumbled upon your blog and project a few months and have admired it from afar. When I was in college, I had a assignment to read and analyze a presidential biography (I chose “Truman”) and was introduced to the University of Kansas Presidents series. I haven’t read any of them, but they all seem to be written by historians. Have you come across these in your project? Wondering what you think of them.
I have indeed come across books in this series! I just looked back and saw that I’ve read University Press of Kansas books on Herbert Hoover, William McKinley and Benjamin Harrison. I think I have a couple upcoming ones as well. In general I’ve tended to read books from this series where there isn’t a robust collection of conventional biographies to choose. The limitation of this series, of course, is that these books generally focus on the presidency rather than providing comprehensive birth-to-death coverage.
Reblogged this on Practically Historical.