Tags
Alonzo Hamby, American history, biographies, book reviews, FDR, Franklin Roosevelt, presidential biographies, US Presidents
Alonza Hamby’s “Man of Destiny: FDR and the Making of the American Century” was published in 2015 and is one of only two comprehensive, single-volume biographies of FDR published recently. Hamby is a historian, author and Distinguished Professor Emeritus of History at Ohio University. He is the author of a biography of Harry S. Truman I read and reviewed in 2016.
While acknowledging there is no shortage of FDR biographies, Hamby felt compelled to write this book given his view that most coverage of FDR is excessively friendly and insufficiently critical. His goal, therefore, was to produce an objective – and efficient – biography of FDR’s entire life. But while this book is judiciously balanced and comparatively short (with 436 pages of text), it almost entirely fails to humanize Roosevelt, offers inadequate coverage of his pre-presidency and exudes a disappointingly antiseptic style.
Franklin Roosevelt’s complicated and contradictory persona can only be unraveled through careful inspection of his early life and career. But Hamby allocates less than one-third of this compact book to FDR’s first fifty years. While no critical elements of Roosevelt’s pre-presidency are missing, the narrative’s pace does not allow the reader to observe numerous personal moments which add clarifying color and complexion to his portrait.
In addition, although Hamby is careful to acquaint the reader with important supporting characters, these introductions are often regrettably terse and too little attention is paid as their roles in FDR’s life evolve and unfold. With Huey Long and Winston Churchill as possible exceptions, no less than Harry Hopkins, Frances Perkins, Louis Howe and Lucy Mercer appear in the narrative only when absolutely necessary.
One of the most compelling components of a great presidential biography is its review of a president-elect’s cabinet selection. Here, however, the author’s description of those weeks is surprisingly bland and reveals relatively little of FDR’s cunning political calculus. Similarly, Roosevelt’s “first hundred days” unfolds in a rather incurious and mechanical way.
Finally, “Man of Destiny” reads like a history text and not like the remarkable life story of one of the most incredible personalities of the 20th century. Given the extraordinary arc of FDR’s life and his enormous impact on history, the narrative is remarkably lifeless and matter-of-fact.
But while far from ideal, there is much to be admired in Hamby’s biography. The text is well-organized and easy to follow, it is undeniably breviloquent (single-volume biographies of Roosevelt often exceed 800 pages) and it reviews FDR’s life with a keen eye on history…if not the associated drama. This biography does not get sidetracked by rumors or innuendo and pays little attention to unverifiable personal peccadilloes.
And while Hamby’s biography of FDR is unlikely to appeal to readers seeking a captivating story or who hope to watch events unfold through Roosevelt’s eyes, it will intrigue serious students of history for whom Roosevelt’s personal relationships and motivations take a back seat to the flow of foreign and domestic affairs.
Overall, Alonzo Hamby’s “Man of Destiny: FDR and the Making of the American Century” is quite competent as history but unexciting as biography. It is articulate but frequently dull, insightful but not revelatory, and methodical but rarely engaging. Readers seeking an efficient facts only approach to Roosevelt’s life may find this biography ideal; most others will find it disappointing.
Overall rating: 3½ stars
Hello, Steve,
Have you ever written about the way you read a book and write an assessment of it?
If so, my apologies.
If not, could you elaborate on your methods of reading and writing?
For example, do you read a certain number of pages a day? Do you take notes while you read?
Do you write your review from an outline or your notes or in some other manner?
Do you write your review in one day or over several days?
Thank you.
I have never formally written about my reading & reviewing methodology though I’ve injected a few observations in comments here and there.
Over a long period of time I’ve averaged about 60 pages of reading a day, but the rule – rather than the exception – suggests I get 100-150 pages done at a time followed by a day or two when I make no progress. I fly for work quite often and that gives me chunks of time with nothing better to do and I try to use those opportunities wisely. I also tend to do better reading in larger chunks rather than finding pockets of ten or fifteen minutes frequently (I remember what I’ve read better if I ingest in fewer but longer stretches rather than lots of 20 or 25 page bursts…)
My overall pace is slowed somewhat by my strange need to take notes which I’ve been doing since I began this in late 2012. I always read with a word processor nearby and capture the best one-liners, most interesting observations and the random fact(s) I didn’t know but need to remember. I probably average five to ten pages of notes per biography so at this point my collection of notes is nearly two-thousand pages. I’m not sure what I’m going to do with them but they not only capture the most clever lines in the books I’ve read but they also reinforce what I’ve learned (since typing the notes forces facts to memory for me).
My reviews are generally written in a single day but I’ve gotten more efficient over time since I’ve adopted a certain “style” and as I’m taking “formal” notes from biographies I am also making notes elsewhere on my impressions of the biography I’m reading. Once I’m finished with the book I can organize those subjective thoughts pretty quickly and begin writing the review. And yet…writing the reviews still take just as long as ever – it’s just a more organized and systematic process.
If I have the ability to do so, I save the finished draft and wait until the next day to post it since I inevitably find errors later or things I’d like to say differently. Recently I calculated that if I had forgone writing reviews but allocated that time to reading I could have gotten through another 75-100 biographies. But where would the fun be in that? 🙂
Dude I SWEAR to God. I was literally about to ask the same question you directed at steve. He always has this insightful reviews and could also articulate his thoughts and argue for and against the assertions in books. Good question, Brad and good answer, Steve.
Reblogged this on Practically Historical.
Steve, Thank you for your very informative and thorough response.