Tags
American history, biographies, book reviews, James Madison, Noah Feldman, presidential biographies, Presidents
Noah Feldman’s “The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President” was published in 2017 and explores the evolving political genius of America’s most introspective Founding Father. Feldman is a professor at Harvard Law School and the author of six previous books including “Scorpions: The Battles and Triumphs of FDR’s Great Supreme Court Justices.”
The book’s publisher promotes this as “an illuminating biography” of James Madison. But Feldman’s 628-page narrative is more an artful exploration of James Madison’s evolving political philosophy than a cradle-to-grave review of his life. Almost nothing of his youth or his retirement years appears, and readers seeking insight into his closest relationships will find even the gregarious Dolley Madison is unusually reclusive.
Feldman’s thesis is straightforward – that Madison led three public lives: as father of the Constitution, as a partisan politician and, finally, as president. Each of these facets of Madison’s life is thoroughly revealed and considered, including the factors which influenced his evolving political perspectives. Readers already acquainted with Madison who are fascinated by politics in early America are likely to find the discussion of his intellectual evolution uncommonly intriguing.
And while Feldman avoids shining a bright light on Madison’s personal life, he does not overlook the private side of his subject entirely. He provides an interesting review of Madison’s failed attempt to marry Kitty Floyd, ongoing references to Dolley Madison which will almost certainly leave readers wishing for a biography of Dolley herself and keen observations concerning Madison’s intellectual strengths and personality challenges.
In addition, Feldman provides a clever comparison of Madison’s and Hamilton’s personas, extensive exposure to the Constitutional Convention, an excellent description of the factors leading to the War of 1812 and a fascinating examination of several Federalist essays. Finally, the book’s final chapter offers a wonderfully thought-provoking review of Madison’s (political) legacy.
But readers expecting comprehensive coverage of Madison’s life will find significant portions of his early life, retirement years and personal relationships missing from the book. And although Feldman could easily have supplemented the narrative to provide readers a deeper sense of Madison’s inner-self, his primary interest was obviously in understanding and conveying Madison’s intellectual development.
In addition, while the narrative’s discussion of serious (and often complicated) history is appropriately sober and scholarly, treatment of some events – such as the Burr/Hamilton duel – come across as surprisingly sterile. This is not unusual for a history text but can prove disappointing in a biography. Finally, the book’s pace is often uneven; the four-month Constitutional Convention, for example, consumes nearly as much space as Madison’s entire first term as president.
On balance, however, Noah Feldman’s “The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President” provides readers with excellent insight into Madison’s evolving political philosophy and his contributions to early American democracy. This book is of most utility to anyone familiar with Madison who wishes to dive deeply into his public life and intellectual development. Readers seeking a thorough introduction to Madison’s public and private lives will need to look elsewhere.
Overall Rating: 3½ stars
Thank you for this, Steve, good review.
Thanks! Was an interesting read for me since this was my 6th book on Madison. Not sure I would have made it all the way through had it been my 1st…
Maybe check out James Madison by Jeff Broadwater for a cradle to grave bio.
Thanks for your hard work here– and for sharing your passion–
Hope all is well.
Best–
Steve Mulhern
Thanks for another great review! Just wondering, the past 10 reviews you’ve put up have been all under 4 stars. Do you think it’s just luck of the draw that they ended up being less impressive books, or have your standards increased over the past years as you’ve read more biographies?
I think the “low hanging fruit” has been picked and to some extent I’m not back-filling with books that are really good in one area (as history, for example) but not ideal in other ways. I do also think I’m probably 1/4 star tougher than in the early days (though I don’t want this to be the case since I’d rather all my ratings were apples-to-apples)…
Understand that ratings take off for failure to cover all of the facets of a true biography, but perhaps there could be a second rating that grades the book on what ever limited scope the author intended?
Since Team of Rivals received a 4 1/2 star and was perhaps also limited as a biography, Stephen, at least in that case seemed to have given a blended score. So I think I am to take that this Madison partial bio get points off for incompleteness and is mediocre enough such that it earns no extra points for style and substance in its limited field?
My ratings are a blend of my perception of the book’s historical contribution and my view of its “readability” and completeness as a biography. So a book can earn 2 1/2 stars in each category. If I could go back in time, I would seriously consider providing two scores – one for each.
In this case this book (and a few of my recent selections) are excellent in the first category but far from ideal in the second.
I also try not to over-emphasize the value of numerical scores, preferring to let my commentary speak for itself when someone is looking for a book to read 🙂
Really struggled with this book, it’s still sitting unfinished on my shelf from a year ago. It’s a tremendously detailed and fascinating account of Madison’s intellectual evolution, and what truly precipitated the creation of the Constitution… but I found the writing style extremely challenging to get into. Feldman assumes the reader has either a deep knowledge of Madison’s personal life – or just hopes they don’t care to learn more. We hardly get a glimpse at Madison’s upbringing, and it seemed to be more a biography exploring his brain then his life.
Maybe that’s a result of not too much information about his true thoughts and beliefs, since I think it’s been stated Madison didn’t have an extensive diary for biographers to read, unlike Adams and Jefferson. But it definitely has left me wanting for more. I’ll try and finish it eventually, I was hoping a high review from Steve would spur me on, but it will remain half finished for a bit longer yet, I think.