Tags
American history, Andrew Jackson, biographies, book reviews, presidential biographies, Presidents, Robert Remini
“Andrew Jackson: The Course of American Freedom (1822-1832)” is the second of three volumes in Robert Remini’s series on Andrew Jackson. This volume was published in 1981 and the series was completed in 1984. Despite the significant historical scholarship and refreshing lucidity it offers, Remini’s series is no longer frequently read. However, in 1988 Remini published a single-volume abridgment of the series which maintains a relatively vigorous following.
Remini was a historian and professor at the University of Illinois and authored several biographies during his forty-year literary career (of John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay and Martin Van Buren, among others). He was named historian of the U.S. House of Representatives in 2005 and was asked to author a narrative history of that legislative body. His resulting work “The House: The History of the House of Representatives” was published in 2006. Remini died earlier this year at the age of 91.
This volume of Remini’s series covers the ten-year period which includes Jackson’s national political ascendancy, his contentious defeat for the presidency in 1824 by John Quincy Adams, his successful presidential campaign in 1828 and his first presidential term. Early in the volume, Remini lays the groundwork to prove the case that the Monroe and Adams administrations created an unprecedented level of corruption within the federal government.
His effort is reasonably, but not entirely, convincing. He successfully demonstrates the existence of widespread, systemic corruption but is less convincing in attributing it directly to Monroe or Adams. This “Era of Corruption” underpins his central thesis that by running for the nation’s highest office, the virtuous General Jackson was responding to a public “call” to rescue the nation from the malfeasance of the very wealthy and the most politically powerful.
Remini does a remarkable job of constructing an interesting, wonderfully penetrating and occasionally provocative narrative of the seventh president. I came away from this volume (and its predecessor) with a far more complete and coherent understanding of Jackson than I developed by reading about him in earlier biographical works by Marquis James and Arthur Schlesinger. Remini not only dissects Jackson’s actions within the context of his personality and worldview, but also wonderfully describes Jackson’s complex network of friends and political allies.
Consistent with his treatment of Jackson in the first volume, there can be no mistake while reading this volume that Remini is favorably disposed toward his primary subject. In fact, although Remini’s Jackson is heroic but deeply flawed, the author has been accused of seeing the world “too much from Jackson’s point of view.” But this criticism is one of shading; Remini’s critiques of Jackson are too frequent and often too searing to leave the reader with an unrealistic, saintly image of Andrew Jackson.
Overall, the second volume of Robert Remini’s series on Andrew Jackson was nearly as outstanding as the first. Though the description of some of the political issues facing President Jackson occasionally became a bit dense (and sometimes felt too lengthy) the book as a whole was well-paced, extremely approachable and quite engaging. This volume on Andrew Jackson was excellent and is well worth reading even without the benefit of the first or third volumes.
Overall rating: 4¼ stars
I just stumbled upon your blog. I am on a similar yet much more modest quest to read at least one biography of each President. I just finished American Lion on Jackson which from reviewing your posts should be coming up for you. I applaud you on your goal and look forward to seeing your reviews from here on out.
Glad you found my blog – and yes, Meacham’s book is coming up within a couple of weeks! I’m aways interested in other opinions (especially when we disagree) so let me know what you think about books we’ve both read as we each keep progressing through the presidents!
Like the previous Jon Morris comment, I too stumbled upon this blog the other day, (I think while looking for a good bio of Madison.) I have had a fascination with US Presidents since the 2nd grade, (when I watched Kennedy’s funeral,) and have continued enjoying reading these biographies to this day. You mention in the blog that some have criticized Remini for being too sympathetic. These critics need to give the author a break, for crying out loud! I cannot imagine spending the decades it took to write this series if you didn’t have some appreciation for the guy. I have avoided Caro’s long series of biographies of Lyndon Johnson, just because he seemed to have (according to book reviews I read) such a low opinion of Johnson.
I have not gotten around to reading this Jackson set, but I did read Remini’s bio of fellow Kentuckian Henry Clay a few years ago, and followed it up with the Daniel webster bio, because the Clay bio was so good. I gained a lot of respect for the author, because he did a nice job of being somewhat sympathetic to someone who was such an enemy of the person that Remini had just spend the previous 20 or so years trying to get into his head.
Most biographers do seem to have an admiration for their subjects but I haven’t found this troubling or problematic (particularly since there is often more than enough information presented to allow the reader to come to a different conclusion, if desired). It probably also helps that I’m reading several books on each president, so I see a wide array of perspectives.
Funny you mentioned the Henry Clay and Daniel Webster bios – I almost wrote in my most recent review (on Vol 3) that I liked the series so much I feel compelled to read Remini’s bios on Clay and Webster who, based on their descriptions in this series, seem like promising subjects for a fascinating biography.
Remini’s Clay book is really, really great.
Working my way through this series now (just finished this volume today). My main observation is how conflicted Remini seems to be: from his language and the general slant of his analysis he clearly wants to admire Jackson, but is too honest of an historian to overlook or downplay his personal faults and reprehensible actions. This really comes to the fore in this book, with its long passages on the Eaton Affair and Indian Removal, where Remini’s very detailed treatment of the topic undermines any defenses he tries to offer. That said, they’re excellent reads and I’m looking forward to finishing the trilogy soon.
I am slowly making my way through presidential bios using your blog as guide (great stuff btw). Now in the midst of Vol 2.
“Remini is favorably disposed toward his primary subject“…this I’m finding is an understatement. I enjoyed Vol 1 but here in my opinion Remini can’t hold back. He goes on and on about how the 1824 election was stolen; it was just very hardball politics. And other examples as well. I’m plodding through this one unfortunately. It’s not written as objectively as I would have like.
Also now in 2020, I’m finding uncomfortable similarities between Jackson and the current WH occupant. Certainly not 100% but there are some parallels in my opinion.