Tags
American history, Andrew Jackson, biographies, book reviews, presidential biographies, Presidents, Robert Remini
“The Life of Andrew Jackson” by Robert Remini is the single-volume abridgment of the author’s classic three-volume series on Andrew Jackson which was published between 1977 and 1984. Although he confessed to finding the distillation process “traumatic and agonizing,” Remini’s abbreviated biography successfully crystallizes (in just one-fourth the space) the essence of his longer series and saves the reader nearly one-thousand pages in the process.
Remini was a historian and professor at the University of Illinois and was known as an exhaustive biographer of Andrew Jackson. During his forty-year literary career he authored dozens of books, among them biographies of Jackson, Daniel Webster, Henry Clay and Martin Van Buren. He was named historian of the U.S. House of Representatives in 2005 and later authored a narrative history of that legislative body. Remini died earlier this year at the age of 91.
Although he claimed difficulty in synthesizing the three-volume series, readers of this single-volume biography who have previously read Remini’s series on Jackson will recognize most, if not all, of the narrative. I assume, therefore, that the difficulty Remini encountered was not in shortening and re-writing the more extensive text, but was more a matter of choosing which three-of-every-four sentences to strike, and which one to keep. On that basis this biography is an extremely stylistically familiar synopsis of the excellent and much longer series.
Also faithfully preserved in this one-volume biography is the author’s unapologetic admiration for Jackson as a political leader, national symbol, and unrelenting force behind a new era of popular democracy. But also retained is Remini’s criticism of Jackson for his most acute flaws and failures – including his treatment of the Indians, his indifference to the plight of slaves and his often abysmal appointments of officeholders. However, readers who found Remini too lax in scolding Jackson’s foibles and deficiencies in his multi-volume series will be similarly vexed by this biography.
Irrespective of one’s view of Remini’s sympathy for Jackson, the seventh president proves an almost perfect figure for an astute, penetrating and delightfully gripping biography. Jackson – as both a military leader and politician – was radiantly charismatic, sometimes maddeningly volatile and exceedingly devoted to the advancement of the “common man’s” cause. He almost single-handedly changed the trajectory of American politics during his presidency. And as a husband he was (much to my surprise) charmingly and uncommonly devoted to his wife – even after her death. In every way he deserves a great biography and Remini proves himself up to the challenge.
Overall, Robert Remini’s “The Life of Andrew Jackson” is a very good summary of his even better three-volume series on Jackson. This biography captures nearly all of the best of the series while leaving behind only less-crucial detail and ancillary color. Very few people will ever consume both the abridgment and the series, but what is clear from the experience is that as significant a task reading nearly fourteen-hundred pages may seem, Remini’s three-part series on Jackson is worth every moment invested and repays its audience in a thousand small ways.
But for the time starved reader, Remini’s single-volume biography of Andrew Jackson is an easy – and extremely worthy – choice. This biography is wonderfully insightful, rich with cogent observations and analysis, and capture’s the core of Remini’s wisdom in an incredibly efficient and effective way.
Overall rating: 4 stars
Look at you go. You are amazing.
Do you find it hard to continue reading when you are on your 3rd+ biography of a single president? Or do you find them sufficiently different to make them individually interesting?
On some occasions, the 3rd or 4th biography of a president is illuminating because it fills in details others left out and finds a way to be unique (this seems most true when I read biographies on someone in order from oldest to most recently published). At least equally (and probably more) often it can be oddly challenging to recognize the story line because an author’s emphasis and point-of-view differ so much from those of previous authors. On balance, reading several biographies of one president has proven more difficult but also more interesting than I would have guessed.
I could imagine, especially if the books are written close to 100 years apart. I just finished Jim Newton’s book on Eisenhower and I couldn’t wait to move on to JFK. But eventually I will go back and read another Ike book.
I rarely read biographies, but was compelled by current events to look into Andrew Jackson. Based on your recommendation I have just purchased Remini’s book. Thank you so much for your incredibly useful site!
You will probably find Andrew Jackson fascinating, although if you are referring to one of the current presidential frontrunners, I find him a curious mix of Jackson and Teddy Roosevelt 🙂 Good luck with Remini – I’m planning to go back and read everything he ever wrote at some point.
I just received this on my doorstep today and didn’t realize it was a abridgment. Mostly I am disappointed that such a small book will represent Jackson in my collection. But I’m not sure I can do the three-volume version. What would you recommend as a heftier 1-volume alternative?
As an alternative to Remini’s single-vol abridgement I would probably read Meacham’s “American Lion” which I liked a lot more than Brands’s bio or Marquis James’s dated (but Pulitzer Prize-winning) biography. Hard to believe it has been 2 1/2 years since I finished up Jackson and in retrospect I’m shocked he hasn’t garnered more attention from some of the better-known contemporary biographers.
I am 100 pages into this, and already I am wishing I had the unabridged version. Don’t get me wrong–it is fantastic so far, despite feeling hurried. Is it just because I know it was chopped to pieces that it feels that way?
Yes, if you read the abridgement and don’t know what it is…you’re probably fine. But once you’re exposed to the full series you realize you really missed dessert! And since I read the full series prior to the abridgement, I do recall thinking that as good as it was, the single-volume bio was clearly extracted from the series and not written as a standalone piece.
Were you too disppoited by the size, as in the actual dimensions of the book not it’s length? Funny as it is to say, I just got it from Amazon and it’s like a “Big Little Book” compared to the full size hard back and paper backs on my shelf. 🙂
My copy seems “full sized”..but your reaction to the book you received reminds me of my copy of “The Fitzgeralds and the Kennedys” which looks like it has been shrunk by 75%. So small I almost had a hard time holding it in my hands-
My copy is full-sized as well. It is a 1988 First Edition with a price on the jacket. Sometimes book club editions or reprints may be sized differently.
It’s 5.5 x 8. It would be a dwarf next to my full size paper and hard back bios of other presidents. Not to be too OCD about it, but how can I have one of the most important presidents, almost invisible on the shelf, between JQA and Van Buren? 😉 lol. I’ve lookd at a used hard back, but don’t like the cover, the photograph of the very, very elderly Jackson. Don’t know what to do here! 🙂
You should try to find the a hardcover first edition. It is full size AND has the 1817 portrait by Ralph E. A. Earl – not the elderly photo.
HBM, thanks for the suggestion. I found the hardback first edition on Amazon in very good condition for about 20 bucks. Thanks Merry Christmas
You’re welcome and Merry Christmas.
Enjoyed reading this condensed version of Remini three volume bio. This bio compared favorably to H.W. Brands and Jon Mea chems one volume bios. Remini is often criticized for being too pro-Jackson, but, although, Remiini certainly likes his subject, I found the bio very objective.
I’ve just finished this. It is as you describe yet I feel Remini’s assertion that Jackson’s “passion for Texas had nothing to do with slavery” is fairly suspect. Also Remini uses the euphemism “servant” instead of slave. In all, I’d say the topic of slavery is considerably white-washed at least in this condensed version. With the official Jackson papers finally coming on line I’d hope a new full treatment of Jackson will be forthcoming by someone unafraid of critical analysis. That is not to say Jackson is undeserving of praise or that Remini fails to critique him but his criticism is with mostly a light touch.